The past couple of days the subject of my religious and scientific beliefs have simmered up to the surface. I’ve never really had much of a quandry between the two, but every once in a while I think about what I believe when I read a discussion about it–a flip statement by a diehard Christian Conservative or an article like this. While my beliefs about God and predestination are different than this gentleman, its still food for thought.
Morning Edition, March 26, 2007 · I believe that God does not know the future. I arrived at this belief after a long and difficult journey through — and eventually away from — the faith in which I was raised. When I was young, many people told me, “God knows everything.” For years I tried to force my beliefs to conform to this view. But finally I took my personal leap of faith: I believe that God loves honesty more than conformity. And so I decided to go where the spirit moved me, even if that was away from the spiritual home of my ancestors. I believe that the fate of our world is not locked in by Scripture, but that the future is shaped by the laws of nature and by what we humans voluntarily do during our time on this planet. Many people believe every sunrise and sunset, every birth and death, every earthquake, flood and plague is a voluntary act of God. Like most scientists, I believe that involuntary laws of nature explain the behavior of planets, tectonic plates, weather systems and viruses. The earth continually spins and dispassionately quakes. Catastrophes happen infrequently. They are manifestations of the same laws of nature that always govern the universe. I believe God never tweaks the laws of nature to achieve some desired outcome. Having accepted this, I do not agonize over why God allows evil to occur. I don’t expect God to intervene to help my team win a basketball game, either. As a kid, I thought God knew who would win before the game began. But today I’m convinced nobody knows for sure, not even God. When I studied science and engineering in college, I met lots of people who had stopped believing in God. They asked, “If science explains the behavior of everything, from electrons to galaxies, then who needs God?” I decided I still did. I agreed that science eliminates the need for a Creator, but the Creator is only one of the masks of God. The dispassionate mathematical laws of physics seem austere and impersonal, like a star or the moon. But the universe contains more than that. It also includes creatures like us who create purpose and meaning. Gravity does not care, but I do. Physics does not explain the difference between sound waves and a song, or the difference between sex and love. Physics explains my body, but not my soul. I believe my soul inspires me to make decisions to diminish pain and increase love in the lives I touch. Lots of times I try, but fail. On a good day I actually get it right! And God is pleasantly surprised. Independently produced for Morning Edition by Jay Allison and Dan Gediman with Viki Merrick.
March 26, 2007 at 6:38 pm
It is interesting food for thought. It’s interesting to me that while the author(s) don’t believe God to be really all that much, he/she is still somewhat concerned about getting things “right” which – for some reason -surprises God. Why worry about what is “right” and be concerned with whether or not it pleases God? Have no answers. I’m not driving an agenda. Just asking questions.
March 28, 2007 at 9:19 am
I think he still believe in God, its just that his views have evolved and developed…from his childhood views and beliefs.
He believes in God–but he doesn’t believe that God is omniscient in a predestination type of way…He believes that God is the captain of his soul, but doesn’t know whether or not his sports team is win.
Each and everyone of us have a personal relationship with God–he took the time to write down his.
March 28, 2007 at 10:30 pm
This is not necessarily a grounded theological thought on my part, but my sense is that God is faithful to deal with the messes I make out of my life; whether or not he knew they were coming. And that, I think, is really good news!
By the way, I haven’t hardly a Calvinistic bone in my body so predestination ain’t my thing.
April 2, 2007 at 2:56 pm
Like I said, I don’t necessarily agree with him. I think what the author is saying doesn’t necessarily contradict what you are saying though.
April 2, 2007 at 4:43 pm
It strikes me that it’s really essential that God _not_ know the future. If God knows what we will do, we don’t really have free will. If we don’t really have free will, we cannot freely chose to enter a relationship with God; it would mean nothing for us to lay our wills at his feet, and we would be puppets rather than beings with divine nature.
April 2, 2007 at 4:57 pm
I don’t know if I agree. I really like that essay, but I can’t help but believing in an omniscient God. However, I know we have agency to choose what we want to do. I don’t think having agency and choosing what we do and an omniscient God is mutually exclusive.